I haven't managed to wade through any significant fraction of the
latest Wikileaks dump, but my initial impression (and it seems others
as well) is, "duh". the headline disclosures—that the US spies
on its allies (including trying to gather personally identifying
information on foreign officials), that its foreign service officers
think various world leaders are morons or jerks (and that in some
cases they actually are jerks in ways we didn't already know), and
that it generally throws its weight around—aren't surprising in
general, even if they are in a few cases surprising in detail
(frequent flyer numbers? really?). What they are, of course, is
embarassing, because these are things that everyone knows even if they
don't generally get admitted to publicly. I don't know if this leak
will cause Hillary Clinton to resign, as Jack Shafer argues, but
I certainly wouldn't be surprised to see some people get fired.
It's not like that's going to change the macro-level behavior though.
You just need some turnover so that we can all pretend that there were a few
bad apples and that of course the US won't be doing that bad stuff in the
future.
The Official Secrets Act is not to protect secrets, it is to protect officials
Categories:
December 2010
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |

Leave a comment