Ohio voting reports

Ohio just published the results of their voting system review. They examined Hart, Premier Election Systems (formerly Diebold) and ES&S. Hart and Diebold were part of the California TTBR and a skim of the TOC and a sampling of the sections suggests that these reports mostly confirm the California/UC result (with one interesting new Hart vuln that allows an attacker with physical access to the interfaces to emulate keypresses, thus automating vote injection.) ES&S was not part of the UC review (but a smaller review was done afterward) and the Ohio team seems to have found serious problems in the ES&S system as well.