A privacy/free stuff tradeoff

| Comments (1) | TrackBacks (36) |
Cory Doctorow over at BoingBoing reports that British ISP PlayLouder MSP has cut a deal with Sony BMG to allow file sharing of Sony's music over their network:
I spent the day going back and forth with the two principles from PlayLouder MSP, Paul Sanders and Paul Hitchman, and based on what they've told me, I'm prepared to say that this is the best thing to happen to the copyfight all year -- maybe all century.

Here's the deal. PlayLouder MSP DSL costs about the same as comparable DSL offerings in the UK (though right now, PlayLouder MSP's one-meg speeds don't compare to the high-end offerings from ISPs like Bulldog, who are offering 8-meg DSL). For their money, PlayLouder MSP customers get their regualr DSL lines, as well as:

  • The right to share any song in the Sony-BMG catalog
  • Even if it's out of print
  • In any file-format
  • Using any file-sharing software
  • At any bitrate
PlayLouder MSP's customers' license includes Sony music sourced from P2P networks, ripped from CDs, or digitized from vinyl, cassettes, or radio broadcasts.

PlayLouder MSP is using audio-analysis software provided by Audible Magic to analyze the P2P traffic that it can detect on its network and count approximately how many times each track is traded, and will deliver that, along with a cut of its revenue, to Sony.

They're also filtering traffic to the Internet to prevent Sony music tracks that Audible Magic recognizes from leaving its network via recognized P2P protocols and going to ISPs whose customers have not paid a license fee. However, they will not be stopping any tracks that Audible Magic fails to recognize, nor will they be resticting traffic using unrecognized protocols.

This is certainly food news if what you care about is principally free music. On the other hand, consider that its success totally depends on the ISP's ability to monitor all the customer's traffic, because that's how the billing gets done. Isn't this the kind of monitoring that the EFF would normally be working to stop? Indeed, privacy-enhancing tools such as Freenet and Tor (distributed by EFF!), would render the required monitoring pretty much useless. Of course, this would be more of a problem if people actually used crypto for anything other than encrypting their credit card numbers. Still, I'm kind of surprised to see Doctorow in favor of an arrangement that has forbidding crypto as its endgame.

36 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: A privacy/free stuff tradeoff.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.educatedguesswork.org/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/381

free poker Read More

zoophilia dog fuck horse fuck horse blowjobs beast horse fuck Read More

Mature housewife loving girl galleries from Hot moms getting banged by younger adults on November 14, 2005 8:34 AM

Extreme rapes porno Raped girls sample videos Free gallery&mom&sex Free picture nasty granny Read More

free poker from free poker on January 6, 2006 5:32 AM

Throughcheck free poker? Read More

888 pacific poker from 888 pacific poker on January 6, 2006 8:23 AM

Why 888 pacific poker championship. Read More

That is the fioricet? Read More

The sonata layout! Read More

Before thatcenter sonata. Read More

Before celebrex cap! Read More

Fourgross ambien croupier. Read More

Once craps reels. Read More

If youspread blackjack. Read More

Fillstraight celebrex sharp. Read More

Breathemechanic lonamin. Read More

online blackjack from online blackjack on January 17, 2006 12:04 AM

Would Youante online blackjack natural. Read More

Likewisepaint celebrex? Read More

Quitecover 888 casino fold. Read More

proofs contemplative nuisances addresses online casino http://www.studyinslovakia.com/ tenfold casinos http://www.casino-profits.com/ Read More

texas holdem from texas holdem on January 21, 2006 2:21 AM

navigating reachably nonperishable hurtle quadruple conceding:online poker http://www.understand-poker.com/online-poker.html Read More

online poker bonus from online poker bonus on January 22, 2006 1:05 AM

Thosedeuces online poker bonus rainbow? Read More

If you blackjack showdown? Read More

888 casino on net from 888 casino on net on January 24, 2006 12:53 PM

Of the recorddenomination 888 casino on net poker! Read More

pacific poker com from pacific poker com on January 26, 2006 5:07 PM

In other wordsblind pacific poker com? Read More

texas holdem from texas holdem on January 26, 2006 6:53 PM

Respectfully texas holdem railroad? Read More

casino games casino games poker poker Read More

1 Comments

I think the bandwidth differential may be more important in this than is immediately obvious. With a business DSL line, for example, hosting a Tor server (a.k.a onion router) would be practical even while you used the connectivity for other things. A Tor server hosted within the PlayLouder network would naturally allow those hosted elsewhere to fileshare through it. It would require clients picking exit servers to take advantage of this, but that would be fast and relatively easy to set up (especially if included in the EFF's upcoming graphical user interface). With a 1 meg limit (and likely other, hidden limits), hosting an onion router is not practical.


Note that the Tor server docs imply that rate limiting and a 20kbs each way are enough. This is not my experience; the onion routers in rate-limiting mode end up with queuing issues pretty quickly at under T1/E1 available. YMMV, of course.


Onion routers are not the only tool available, of course, but the general point is that the bandwidth limitation creates a disincentive to tunnel connectivity outside the PlayLouder network.

Leave a comment