Physical advantages

| Comments (8) | TrackBacks (14) |
Drivers are complaining that Danica Patrick has an advantage at the Indy 500 because she only weighs 100 lbs:
"The lighter the car, the faster it goes," Gordon said. "Do the math. Put her in the car at her weight, then put me or Tony Stewart in the car at 200 pounds and our car is at least 100 pounds heavier.

"I won't race against her until the IRL does something to take that advantage away."

The IndyCar Series does not consider the weight of the driver in its race specifications. The car has to weigh at least 1,525 pounds before the fuel and driver are added, and teams in Indy have estimated that Patrick will gain close to 1 mph in speed because of her small stature.

No doubt the weight advantage is real, but so what? Sports are full of situations in which one competitor has a physical advantage over another. Presumably, Gordon's current position is at least partly due to his good reflexes. Should he have to put some kind of damper on his steering wheel so that I have a shot against him?

14 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Physical advantages.

TrackBack URL for this entry:

potassium information from on July 24, 2005 7:40 PM

cidex and potassium permanganate potassium chromium sulfate no potassium diet liquid potassium albumin, calcium and potassium potassium levels in alcohol physical properties of potassium hydroxide potassium depletion during fasting potassium difficien... Read More

Physical advantages Read More

Well, again. from foosh's blog on October 25, 2005 7:53 PM

It could stand to be noted that, as I say this right now, even a second point deserves to be made. Firstly, I'm not wearing any pants. But seriously, I'm tired of this old point. Read More

Mature fee sex gallery Mom milf free trailer Free video preview sex mature Fucking mature ladies free videos Read More

cialis generic from cialis generic on November 30, 2005 8:46 PM

cialis generic Read More

poker hand rankings from poker hand rankings on December 7, 2005 12:40 PM

culpa icons,Bulgarian articulating timings intellect springing poker game Read More

Payday Loans from Payday Loans on January 18, 2006 8:47 PM

Payday Loans is a niceblog. Read More

Free Ringtones from Free Ringtones on January 21, 2006 1:56 PM

Free Ringtones Read More

World Poker Tournament from World Poker Tournament on February 1, 2006 8:01 PM

Tournaments poker Diametric tournaments poker poker tournaments russet poker tournaments. Read More

trans siberian orchestra from trans siberian orchestra on February 8, 2006 1:22 AM

trans siberian orchestra Read More

Online Blackjack from Online Blackjack on February 9, 2006 11:39 AM

Blackjack ash-blonde blackjack free online blackjack five-days-a-week free online blackjack. Read More

small dogs Read More


I'm afraid I find your argument is a little too facile. Would you, by the same logic, require the elimination of weight divisions in boxing or wrestling? It seems like there is a simple fix: mandate a minimum weight for the car + driver. In fact, this is exactly the rule in place in Formula One racing.

You can't compare weight requirements in Boxing to auto racing. Boxing has weight divisions for safety. With out them little guys would get killed. The same isn't true with Patrick. Gordon is complaining because he thinks he's at a competitive disadvantage. You wouldn't and don't hear him complaining about guys that way more then he does. Maybe if he mixed in the occasional salad and don't guzzle so much beer...

First of all, nobody would get killed in wrestling/boxing even if you had no weight categories. The guys who'd get killed would simply not compete. Second, what I pointed out was that the argument saying "you cannot create any rules to level the playing field" is incorrect because many sports do have such rules. What you think of those rules, and whether you like them, is a matter of taste.

You're right, nobody would get killed without weight classes in boxing because little guys would never compete. But you're wrong in suggesting that weight classes "level the playing field" They merely make a league for smaller people to play in.

An example of leveling the playing field in Boxing would be if heavier players, when playing against lighter players would be forced to wear a device to limit the strength of their punching. That would be levelling the playing field, and that would be absurd

I discuss this further on my blog.

I'm not saying that you can't create any rules to level the playing field. I'm saying that the rules that people create to level the playing field are sort of arbitrary and less a matter of fairness than of making competition more interesting. In such an environment, whining about something that gives someone a slight edge (and I do mean slight; look at Patrick's record ), is fairly silly, unless you're prepared to give up whatever your edge is.

When I read this, I thought immediately about horse racing. On TV, the jockeys are weighed with their saddles right before each race, and weights are added to even everybody out. (I'm assuming that the depiction was accurate.)

I don't pay any attention to racing, but I know that Indy 500 races often have problem with racecars running out of fuel. One hundred pounds in a 500 mile race is a HUGE advantage.

I read about this over at Kevin Drum's blog, I think. Amidst all the NASCAR-dad/RedState bashing, there were a couple of interesting points made:

Indy racing doesn't handicap for weight. NASCAR does - all drivers under 200 pounds have to add ballast to make up 200 pounds. Drivers heavier than that just have to go on a diet.

While weight does confer an advantage, so does upper-body strength. Ms Patrick will likely find it harder to operate her car than other drivers will their cars.

The driver who made the statement is apparently a notorious loudmouth whiner in Indy racing. This is his version of trash-talk.

They say "Once is commentary. Twice is coincidence. Three times is a flame war." :-) Nevertheless, I'll post my final remarks here. I agree with most of EKR's comments but differ with him on the conclusion. My blog says more.

Leave a comment